reorder
notfoundero.alexadeal.com
ALWAYS Be Happy search home
c
Combo Blog
Categories
Play Games New

Category NeutralityA Type-Logical Investigation

About The .. Here the verb 'put' acts simultaneously as a past participle (as in have never put) and a base form (as in will never put) and is therefore said to be neutral between the two forms

Feature neutrality is an issue that has received much attention among linguists.

The accepted wisdom is that neutrality is possible only for morphosyntactic features such as verb form gender number declension class-not at the level of gross syntactic category where the semantic differences are more significant.

This not only challenges the current thinking but also raises foundational questions about the nature of ambiguity.

(A famous example is the glaring ungrammaticality of this sentence in which can is used simultaneously as a main verb and auxiliary verb: I can tuna and get a new job.

This not only challenges the current thinking but also raises foundational questions about the nature of ambiguity.

Here the verb 'put' acts simultaneously as a past participle (as in have never put) and a base form (as in will never put) and is therefore said to be neutral between the two forms.

) In this book however Neal Whitman shows that category neutrality does exist in English.

(A famous example is the glaring ungrammaticality of this sentence in which can is used simultaneously as a main verb and auxiliary verb: I can tuna and get a new job.

In other words it has been claimed that category neutrality where a word or phrase is used simultaneously with more than one syntactic category does not exist.

Investigation NeutralityA Category Type-Logical.

Similar examples have been found for many languages.

For example consider the sentence I have never and will never put my name on this document.

The accepted wisdom is that neutrality is possible only for morphosyntactic features such as verb form gender number declension class-not at the level of gross syntactic category where the semantic differences are more significant.

.

In other words it has been claimed that category neutrality where a word or phrase is used simultaneously with more than one syntactic category does not exist.

Feature neutrality is an issue that has received much attention among linguists.

) In this book however Neal Whitman shows that category neutrality does exist in English.

Here the verb 'put' acts simultaneously as a past participle (as in have never put) and a base form (as in will never put) and is therefore said to be neutral between the two forms.

Similar examples have been found for many languages.

For example consider the sentence I have never and will never put my name on this document

Feature neutrality is an issue that has received much attention among linguists. For example consider the sentence I have never and will never put my name on this document. Here the verb 'put' acts simultaneously as a past participle (as in have never put) and a base form (as in will never put) and is therefore said to be neutral between the two forms. Similar examples have been found for many languages. The accepted wisdom is that neutrality is possible only for morphosyntactic features such as verb form gender number declension class-not at the level of gross syntactic category where the semantic differences are more significant. In other words it has been claimed that category neutrality where a word or phrase is used simultaneously with more than one syntactic category does not exist. (A famous example is the glaring ungrammaticality of this sentence in which can is used simultaneously as a main verb and auxiliary verb: I can tuna and get a new job.) In this book however Neal Whitman shows that category neutrality does exist in English. This not only challenges the current thinking but also raises foundational questions about the nature of ambiguity.

Category NeutralityA Type-Logical Investigation

Feature neutrality is an issue that has received much attention among linguists. For example consider the sentence I have never and will never put my name on this document. Here the verb 'put' acts simultaneously as a past participle (as in have never put) and a base form (as in will never put) and is therefore said to be neutral between the two forms. Similar examples have been found for many languages. The accepted wisdom is that neutrality is possible only for morphosyntactic features such as verb form gender number declension class-not at the level of gross syntactic category where the semantic differences are more significant. In other words it has been claimed that category neutrality where a word or phrase is used simultaneously with more than one syntactic category does not exist. (A famous example is the glaring ungrammaticality of this sentence in which can is used simultaneously as a main verb and auxiliary verb: I can tuna and get a new job.) In this book however Neal Whitman shows that category neutrality does exist in English. This not only challenges the current thinking but also raises foundational questions about the nature of ambiguity.

Specifications of Category NeutralityA Type-Logical Investigation

CategoryMedia > Books > Print Books
Instockinstock

Last Updated

Category NeutralityA Type-Logical Investigation
more variety

Feature neutrality is an issue that has received much attention among linguists. For example consider the sentence I have never and will never put my name on this document. Here.

Rating :- 9.1 /10
Votes :- 240